Offensive and defensive assumptions behind Blitz Basketball

by on April 26, 2016
in Strategy

Last week, I re-formatted the diagrams in Blitz Basketball to make it available through Amazon Kindle. It was the first time that I had read the book since I wrote it in 2008 (originally in 2006, with the second version completed in 2008). 

After a decade, I was happy to see that much of the book has held up to the test of time. Specifically, I think many current offenses and defenses are based on the same or similar assumptions that I used when developing the offensive and defensive systems initially. The original 10 assumptions from Blitz Basketball were:

  1. 1v1 in open space, the offensive player has the advantage.
  2. Teams who make a lot of free throws win a lot of games.
  3. When a defense is forced to scramble, more fouls are committed and more offensive rebounds relinquished.
  4. Offensive rebounds lead to fouls, points, and free throws.
  5. A turnover is a wasted possession.
  6. Catching the ball squared to the basket greatly improves a shooter’s percentage.
  7. Dribble penetration is toughest to defend.
  8. Most teams rely heavily on starters and see a big drop-off after their fourth or fifth player.
  9. Offensive players are ill-equipped to handle pressure for a full game.
  10. Forcing players to make decisions at a faster pace leads to mistakes

There are definite similarities to SABA: The Antifragile Offense, which is based on my current beliefs and teaching practices with higher level teams.

I don’t think of myself as a system coach, and I remain flexible depending on my personnel, but it is evident through the two books, written 10 years apart, that there are certainly beliefs upon which I base my systems and style of play from year to year.

By Brian McCormick, PhD
Director of Coaching, Playmakers Basketball Development League
Author, The 21st Century Basketball Practice and Fake Fundamentals

Sharing is caring!

  • What Is A Playmaker?

    Who decided that a point guard has to be small? More importantly, what is a point guard? We expect a point guard to be a leader and have a high basketball I.Q. Why don’t we expect or challenge all players to develop this game awareness? Why rely on only one player? Read more →
  • The PBDL Concept

    English soccer academies wait until players are 11 to play full 11v11 soccer; in Italy, youth basketball players participate in skill-oriented clinics at 6-years-old, but start competitive games at 12. In the United States, kids play 5v5 full court games and compete for national championships when they are 8-years-old.

    Read more →

  • Starting A PBDL

    The PBDL emphasizes learning and development. Presently, players and parents have numerous recreation options - leagues based on fun and equal participation, typically for beginners - and numerous competitive opportunities - teams focused on strategy, game preparation and winning. There are few true development leagues - until now.

    Read more →